It's such a shame they started to care about ℗ and © with their CD releases. The informations so far are pure guessworks, and I often wonder how some figured out the more plausible release years, because there are no copyrights on the LP sleeves or the records themselves. Judging from my experience with styles, sounds and intruments/tech used in these tracks, I grudgingly use those guesswork years for my tags. I allow one year difference, but everything else irks me to the point I rather not include said tracks into my collection..... (In general, I am getting very frustrated with certain labels. Missing release years, fine, but sometimes even the composers are messed and mixed up. Don't they need to be very strict about these names - it's about their pay after all if someone license those tracks.. KPM for example lists albums as "2001" on their website while on Discogs, you can see the 2000 copyright clearly on the disk's photo!)
EDIT: Oh, and also, without sounding too greedy, but are the other ATMOS LPs being shared too later or should I compile a more specific request in the subforum? Not all tracks are re-issued on the CDs of which I had access to thanks to our Chinese friend. I, just like Retronic, lost track of what is available on LMT within these two threads and what was discarded.