Henryk & Orkiestra PRiTV 2026 NEW STUFF

[sj_beat]

Enjoy brothers and sisters 
h  -  SJ  -  s:// removed

4 LMT only 

[Viostel]

Thank you very much SJ

[keir]

Thank you! This is a treat, not long since I got caught up with Wspomnienie.

[BlackwatchPlaid]

Staff have made it known they don't want stuff from this label and this album specifically being shared here

https://librarymusicthemes.com/index.php?topic=11138

[Swingalong]

Yet Sonoton, Intersound, and KPM albums are shared here despite being sold at inflated prices by various music retail sites, in flac format! Not trying to be rude or argumentative, but where is the line drawn? And how is it not entirely arbitrary?

[BlackwatchPlaid]

Yet Sonoton, Intersound, and KPM albums are shared here despite being sold at inflated prices by various music retail sites, in flac format! Not trying to be rude or argumentative, but where is the line drawn? And how is it not entirely arbitrary?

You are trying to be argumentative

[Ene]

Releases from GAD Records are not welcome here, as we strive to support such labels. Henryk Debich's albums are mostly being released on physical media for the first time, so it's understandable that it's worth supporting such initiatives by purchasing them. Best regards.

[sj_beat]

removed at the request of forum participants  With respect, SJ_Be@T 

[Swingalong]

Yet Sonoton, Intersound, and KPM albums are shared here despite being sold at inflated prices by various music retail sites, in flac format! Not trying to be rude or argumentative, but where is the line drawn? And how is it not entirely arbitrary?

You are trying to be argumentative

No, I was asking a question because I wanted to know where the line is drawn. However, Ene has now provided an answer. Thank you Ene for clarifying.

[BlackwatchPlaid]

Yet Sonoton, Intersound, and KPM albums are shared here despite being sold at inflated prices by various music retail sites, in flac format! Not trying to be rude or argumentative, but where is the line drawn? And how is it not entirely arbitrary?

You are trying to be argumentative

No, I was asking a question because I wanted to know where the line is drawn. However, Ene has now provided an answer. Thank you Ene for clarifying.

The link I referred to was all the clarification that is necessary but whatever man

[Swingalong]

Oh. OK... It's an unusual situation on this site so I was slow to understand what or why... perhaps this is why the non-library section was closed?

[BlackwatchPlaid]

perhaps this is why the non-library section was closed?

Are you trolling me right now?? From my link

[Swingalong]

Of course I'm not trolling you. Your link says the non-library section was closed because it "could cause trouble", but the potential trouble was never described, so I am now assuming it was because sharing newly released material here could be harmful to the creators. I thought it was because we were at risk of being closed down for copyright reasons.

Can you direct me to the link to the Apollo Sound LP containing the Henryk Debich tracks? I've been looking for it but haven't yet stumbled across it.

[Fuzi]

@swingalong

The non-library section was originally intended for releases by known library musicians on non-library labels — for example, a film soundtrack by Ennio Morricone.

Over time, however, the section started to resemble a colorful dumpster of loosely related material. Gradually, it became a general dumping ground for anything that was not strictly library music.

At that point, the moderators felt it no longer represented the unique purpose of this community, which is to share and discuss library music.

Sharing commercially available music is a different matter. It’s easy to see how doing so can harm publishers and their business, and we aim to respect them and their business.

[Swingalong]

Thank you Fuzi for your explanation.

Perhaps the section could be reopened, but with all submissions held for moderation to ensure nothing is being shared that could cause problems for us?