Do I need to paste here what Stack said that day?
Well..
"In my mind at least, "wonderful & strange music" was originally meant to refer generally to what used to be called "mood" music (c. 1950-1980) and includes (but not limited to) easy listening, "lounge" music, b-movie film scores, etc. etc" ... and so on.
In his mind he was referring to mood music, circa 1950-1980. You get it? And this is just to give you an answer about the answer you like to refer to.
I guess Retro's answer on the same thread instead, is not to your liking?
"I originally created that for library musicians commercial releases so they are very closely related to library. It was never intended as a OST or funk forum."
At the end, the umpteenth debate to reiterate a simple concept as stated in the very first sticky post dated 28 february 2018 at the launching of LMT v.7 (the one you hadn't seen):
please try to keep this section at least somewhat library-related
You know, anything involving library musicians, even their commercial release which could be OST or any other genre.
This is how it was intended in its creation, and this is still the case today, despite the fact that over the years some posts have not been contested.
An indication not too difficult to understand.
Now, an OST (by Peter Gabriel or Katsuo Ohno) is not suitable just because it's an OST. And it's because no library musicians are involved, no library tracks are involved, no people who "once wrote a library track or collaborated with some library musician" are involved, no library labels are involved.
Unless, obviously, in my ignorance I ignore that Peter Gabriel or Katsuo Ohno had at least once something to do with the library world.