Library Music Themes

General Sharing & Discussion => Requests => Topic started by: Eternas Ondas Musicales on February 09, 2025, 08:53:49 PM

Title: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: Eternas Ondas Musicales on February 09, 2025, 08:53:49 PM
(https://i.discogs.com/H-mkwg3NORc5PZVDXQylc--YMCVt4AOuVvO5ipGDRj0/rs:fit/g:sm/q:90/h:597/w:600/czM6Ly9kaXNjb2dz/LWRhdGFiYXNlLWlt/YWdlcy9SLTQ3NzE2/MDAtMTY2MTI2NTc2/MS03MjM2LmpwZWc.jpeg) (https://i.discogs.com/SapS5MPHe8M33R2ZHSsB3IntJTtV7w5UcD_U2riKcgM/rs:fit/g:sm/q:90/h:600/w:593/czM6Ly9kaXNjb2dz/LWRhdGFiYXNlLWlt/YWdlcy9SLTIxOTUz/OTIwLTE3MzkxMzQy/NzYtMjY1MC5qcGVn.jpeg)

These rips are in OPUS format in slsk. I would appreciate in advance if you could send me the original FLAC 24-48 file.  :)

[B.C.E. Record] - PO 4947 - Marcello Faneschi - Dimensione Musica
[B.C.E. Record] - PO 5957 - Manoche Band - Untitled
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: Ene on February 10, 2025, 02:25:40 PM
Only opus format. Sorry.
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: Jorge Pac on February 10, 2025, 02:55:55 PM
Not only... If you ask nicely, then:

workupload.com/file/fLrnggeqKeQ - Dimensione Musica
workupload.com/file/hDFG7XnwgJQ - Untitled

with gratitude to StumbledOnThis & adktz  ;)
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: Greta on February 10, 2025, 04:02:52 PM
I've just edited your post Jorge. We'd discourage hotlinks.

These records were rips and shares by one of our fellow member on this forum (Rocco or roope, can't recall right now), and they were both 24-48.
Kudos to them both anyways.
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: Eternas Ondas Musicales on February 10, 2025, 05:22:21 PM
Many thanks Jorge for reupload, and Rocco for the original rips! 🦀
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: Jorge Pac on February 10, 2025, 05:29:43 PM
I've just edited your post Jorge. We'd discourage hotlinks.
Sorry, but then for what cases are the “Insert hyperlink” and “Insert FTP link” buttons provided in the editing options?
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: orsolinobarocco on February 10, 2025, 07:27:19 PM
Thanks Jorge, and Rocco or rope for original rip!
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: Greta on February 10, 2025, 08:09:18 PM
Jorge,
I've missed to say we discourage hotlinks to external sharing sites and companies official sites, and that's for safety reasons.
The fact this forums allows hotlinks doesn't mean anything. It's our choice, cause we have had problems in the past.
This site offers that option and it's something we just can't remove (I think), but we try our best to try avoiding potential threats.

Hotlinks to any other site like Discogs, or Youtube (through embedded video too) it shouldn't be a problem.
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: Fuzi on February 11, 2025, 01:53:13 AM
I've just edited your post Jorge. We'd discourage hotlinks.
Sorry, but then for what cases are the “Insert hyperlink” and “Insert FTP link” buttons provided in the editing options?

I sometimes hyperlink to other pages of this forum.

and thank you Jorge for your shares !!
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: Jorge Pac on February 11, 2025, 02:30:16 PM
In general, it is clear and I, of course, obey the Rules established here, but in order to finally close the question, I will clarify - is this kind of link pixeldrain.com/u/Rr3g16iC to a file hosting service also undesirable?
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: Greta on February 11, 2025, 08:42:13 PM
Are you serious?

NO-CLICKABLE-TEXT-LEADING-TO-SUCH-SITES-ALREADY-MENTIONED

And please, try not to break the rules again just to ask a question.
Thanks.

*hotlink edited*
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: Eternas Ondas Musicales on June 07, 2026, 09:49:58 AM
I was analyzing the tracks from PO 5947 using the acoustic spectrum, and they are 16-bit 48 kHz, not 24-bit 48 kHz. Do any of you have the original files that Rocco shared? Thanks in advance.
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: nidostar on June 07, 2026, 10:17:59 AM
I was analyzing the tracks from PO 5947 using the acoustic spectrum, and they are 16-bit 48 kHz, not 24-bit 48 kHz. Do any of you have the original files that Rocco shared? Thanks in advance.
I'm afraid not. I don't see the point in saving audio files in a format which can handle frequencies only my dog can hear. The human ear cannot detect frequencies above 20kHz. It's madness and all you end up with is bloated files with the same audible (to humans) results.  ;)
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: Greta on June 07, 2026, 12:39:42 PM
Here they are for all the dogs who are more comfortable with ultrasounds.

transfer.it/t/s9awr6gnzD4a


Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: BlackwatchPlaid on June 07, 2026, 12:58:06 PM

I'm afraid not. I don't see the point in saving audio files in a format which can handle frequencies only my dog can hear. The human ear cannot detect frequencies above 20kHz. It's madness and all you end up with is bloated files with the same audible (to humans) results.  ;)

that's per channel. 24 khz left ear and 24khz right ear. 48kHz is standard frequency response rate for DVDs. 44 (22.05 khz per ear) is the standard for CDs.

Most of the non-library vinyl rips for which I have many hundreds, are usually ripped to 96kHz, the trend nowadays is 192kHz. 48kHz is hardly cause for alarm lol.
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: nidostar on June 07, 2026, 03:46:45 PM
that's per channel. 24 khz left ear and 24khz right ear. 48kHz is standard frequency response rate for DVDs. 44 (22.05 khz per ear) is the standard for CDs.

Most of the non-library vinyl rips for which I have many hundreds, are usually ripped to 96kHz, the trend nowadays is 192kHz. 48kHz is hardly cause for alarm lol.
I think we're at cross-purposes I was referring to the human ear frequency range which is typically from 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz (20 kHz). It's the excessive bit rates used for simple listening purposes at home through, perhaps, an okay hi-fi system which puzzles me.
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: BlackwatchPlaid on June 07, 2026, 04:32:53 PM
that's per channel. 24 khz left ear and 24khz right ear. 48kHz is standard frequency response rate for DVDs. 44 (22.05 khz per ear) is the standard for CDs.

Most of the non-library vinyl rips for which I have many hundreds, are usually ripped to 96kHz, the trend nowadays is 192kHz. 48kHz is hardly cause for alarm lol.
I think we're at cross-purposes I was referring to the human ear frequency range which is typically from 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz (20 kHz). It's the excessive bit rates used for simple listening purposes at home through, perhaps, an okay hi-fi system which puzzles me.

I understand what you meant, and what I meant was that 48khz you are complaining about is a stereo file and as such, it is 24khz per ear, which is not very far outside of that range you are quoting. Open it up in adobe audition or something, you'll see 2 separate waveforms each topping out at 24khz.

(https://i.ibb.co/MyFfkJyS/Capture.png) (https://ibb.co/vC0h4MCq)
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: Eternas Ondas Musicales on June 07, 2026, 06:57:51 PM
Here they are for all the dogs who are more comfortable with ultrasounds.

transfer.it/t/s9awr6gnzD4a

Thanks Greta, cheers.
Title: Re: B.C.E. Record Request
Post by: nidostar on June 07, 2026, 08:49:20 PM
I understand what you meant, and what I meant was that 48khz you are complaining about is a stereo file and as such, it is 24khz per ear, which is not very far outside of that range you are quoting. Open it up in adobe audition or something, you'll see 2 separate waveforms each topping out at 24khz.
Then apologies BWP I explained myself badly. But I did find your response amusing. Thanks.