Library Music Themes
General Sharing & Discussion => Vintage Library Vinyl and CD rips => Topic started by: Greta on June 11, 2023, 11:02:50 AM
-
I've seen a request about this few days ago.
I was intrigued by the record cause it was reminding me to something.
Till I realized it's a mix of a couple of Mozart Edition (n.52 and n.61 if I recall correctly).
The two Mozart have been shared in the past, so I merged them and set up what I think was the right tracklist.
Thanks to the OP's of the Mozart rips.
Enjoy.
(https://i.imgur.com/b0oRIFZ.jpg)(https://i.imgur.com/NOb87Po.jpg)
[Radio Records] - RR 121 - Complesso Iron Stars - Il Complesso Iron Stars Presenta (1969)
music by Maria Augusta Bruni, Fausto Maggioni, Ugo Adducci, Chiola (Fausto Maggioni), Asfrinio (Mario Morghen)
flac - 16bit, 44.1kHz
mega.nz/file/HZ5gzZqb#aK5wp1WdRGXFBkEzjQd8ROoHHDy2QzSGJFe7HTzsGGo
-
Cool Greta! Thanks for your shares :)
-
Thanks a lot!
-
Thanks a lot for this gem Greta!
A new Radio Records, bright and sparkling. Much appreciated!
-
Well remembered, Greta. Thanks for this share. So these are works written by Italian composers but, according to the back of MELP 52, the copyright is held by the British publisher Mozart Edition rather than the Italian label Radio Records? No wonder I find the world of library music so confusing. And that's before the likes of Fay Gibbs change the names of all the titles.
-
Great work, thank you very much Greta. :)
-
Thanks Greta for the excellent rip.
-
Great job !
Thanks Greta to clear the light on this
Apparently several of Radio records comes from Moazart edition,
as RR 122 mostly ME LP 020, RR 123 is ME LP 024, ...
-
Thanks !
-
Thank you very much!
-
Amazing, thanks very much Greta.
-
thanks!
-
Thank you for this, Greta! However ...
... what you've done has resulted in a misrepresentation. This is not a rip of Radio Records RR 121.
The fact that it isn't but is labelled as such is going to lead to problems in the future when this home-made compilation of parts of two Mozart rips of unknown -- and possibly different -- pedigree is shared by others. Then it will turn into a falsification, misleading people into believing they've got something which in reality they don't.
I would like to ask you (and all downloaders here as well) to consider tagging these files according to their true nature, at least. This might leave a bit of a chance that not everyone who happens to receive them via downloads of downloads of downloads will entertain illusions about what they actually are.
It should also increase the probability that we may, at some point, be able to listen to a veritable recording of Radio Records RR 121.
PS I have deleted my download, as it is the easiest way of avoiding the problems described above.
-
Thank you for this, Greta! However ...
... what you've done has resulted in a misrepresentation. This is not a rip of Radio Records RR 121.
The fact that it isn't but is labelled as such is going to lead to problems in the future when this home-made compilation of parts of two Mozart rips of unknown -- and possibly different -- pedigree is shared by others. Then it will turn into a falsification, misleading people into believing they've got something which in reality they don't.
I would like to ask you (and all downloaders here as well) to consider tagging these files according to their true nature, at least. This might leave a bit of a chance that not everyone who happens to receive them via downloads of downloads of downloads will entertain illusions about what they actually are.
It should also increase the probability that we may, at some point, be able to listen to a veritable recording of Radio Records RR 121.
PS I have deleted my download, as it is the easiest way of avoiding the problems described above.
Personally I think that this is taking things a little far. Judging from the comments in this topic many members, including myself, appreciate Greta's share. Whilst the compilation may not be a faithful rip of a Radio Records album it is an accurate representation of how the album would sound and Greta has made that clear in her post. For me it's all about the music. But that's just my opinion.
-
Super ...πππ
Many thanks Greta πΈπΉ
-
thank you very much
-
I got an og pressing of this one and just gave it a listening It seems that some numbers were re-recorded because they differ from the Mozart versions in a minimal way. Someone here is probably a bit small-minded but we don't let that take away the fun! Everyone here can be happy to even get the pleasure of listening to this little italian library masterpiece.
It is a wonderful share Greta and I appreciate your post very much!! It has a great audio quality...
-
thank you, greta!!
I personally had no idea this RR title languoring in my discogs wantlist for years was essentially two previously shared Mozarts!!
again, thank you, it is great to finally hear these recordings.
and thank you n. 2 for this information. LMT is knowledge and music alike.
frankly it is fascinating to learn these RR tracks are unique recordings and not merely 'radio remixes' or 'edits'. wow!!
speaking of RR discogs languouring longshots, anyone have
Ninety, Radio Records, RR 138.
happy Sunday, friends!!
:)
geo
-
Thank you very much Greta...it's good to know where these 2 Mozarts we're coming from...
-
... many members, including myself, appreciate Greta's share. ...
How many members appreciate this share is immaterial to the point I'm making. There is a problem in cobbling together rips and then tagging the result in a way to make it appear as something that it's not.
... it is an accurate representation of how the album would sound and Greta has made that clear in her post. ...
As one user who apparently knows the record in question has stated: the real RR 121 differs from the made-up version. So the representation isn't accurate, as was to be expected. While Greta clearly describes the nature of her share here, the share itself does not make it clear.** Hence, when this share is shared further -- as it is bound to be --, it is going to turn into a falsification. The solution that I suggest is to tag the share properly, thereby making its patchwork origins obvious. That is all.
... But that's just my opinion.
What else could it be?
_____
** Or did not make it clear; perhaps Greta has heeded my advice in the meantime.
-
... many members, including myself, appreciate Greta's share. ...
How many members appreciate this share is immaterial to the point I'm making. There is a problem in cobbling together rips and then tagging the result in a way to make it appear as something that it's not.
... it is an accurate representation of how the album would sound and Greta has made that clear in her post. ...
As one user who apparently knows the record in question has stated: the real RR 121 differs from the made-up version. So the representation isn't accurate, as was to be expected. While Greta clearly describes the nature of her share here, the share itself does not make it clear.** Hence, when this share is shared further -- as it is bound to be --, it is going to turn into a falsification. The solution that I suggest is to tag the share properly, thereby making its patchwork origins obvious. That is all.
... But that's just my opinion.
What else could it be?
_____
** Or did not make it clear; perhaps Greta has heeded my advice in the meantime.
In light of the post subsequent to mine from @No2 I see your point. The fact that the songs were re-recorded is what makes the difference. Though, to be fair, we didn't know that when Greta first posted.
"That's just my opinion" is a figure of speech in English meaning I realise I may not be speaking for everyone. :)