Library Music Themes
General Sharing & Discussion => Vintage Library Vinyl and CD rips => Topic started by: sj_beat on March 06, 2026, 03:30:31 PM
-
Enjoy brothers and sisters 8]
h - SJ - s:// removed
(https://i.discogs.com/eBrxBxsy_X4DDHmaBrOBuNfjo9c9mIWXMoC1PZdUb0M/rs:fit/g:sm/q:90/h:600/w:600/czM6Ly9kaXNjb2dz/LWRhdGFiYXNlLWlt/YWdlcy9SLTM2NTAy/MzY2LTE3NzEwNzg5/NzEtMjQ3OC5qcGVn.jpeg)
4 LMT only ;)
-
Thank you very much SJ :)
-
Thank you! This is a treat, not long since I got caught up with Wspomnienie.
-
Staff have made it known they don't want stuff from this label and this album specifically being shared here
https://librarymusicthemes.com/index.php?topic=11138
-
Yet Sonoton, Intersound, and KPM albums are shared here despite being sold at inflated prices by various music retail sites, in flac format! Not trying to be rude or argumentative, but where is the line drawn? And how is it not entirely arbitrary?
-
Yet Sonoton, Intersound, and KPM albums are shared here despite being sold at inflated prices by various music retail sites, in flac format! Not trying to be rude or argumentative, but where is the line drawn? And how is it not entirely arbitrary?
You are trying to be argumentative
-
Releases from GAD Records are not welcome here, as we strive to support such labels. Henryk Debich's albums are mostly being released on physical media for the first time, so it's understandable that it's worth supporting such initiatives by purchasing them. Best regards.
-
removed at the request of forum participants :'( With respect, SJ_Be@T ;)
-
Yet Sonoton, Intersound, and KPM albums are shared here despite being sold at inflated prices by various music retail sites, in flac format! Not trying to be rude or argumentative, but where is the line drawn? And how is it not entirely arbitrary?
You are trying to be argumentative
No, I was asking a question because I wanted to know where the line is drawn. However, Ene has now provided an answer. Thank you Ene for clarifying.
-
Yet Sonoton, Intersound, and KPM albums are shared here despite being sold at inflated prices by various music retail sites, in flac format! Not trying to be rude or argumentative, but where is the line drawn? And how is it not entirely arbitrary?
You are trying to be argumentative
No, I was asking a question because I wanted to know where the line is drawn. However, Ene has now provided an answer. Thank you Ene for clarifying.
The link I referred to was all the clarification that is necessary but whatever man
-
Oh. :o OK... It's an unusual situation on this site so I was slow to understand what or why... perhaps this is why the non-library section was closed?
-
perhaps this is why the non-library section was closed?
Are you trolling me right now?? From my link
(https://i.ibb.co/DHn43RMd/Capture.png) (https://ibb.co/q3wBbrg6)
-
Of course I'm not trolling you. Your link says the non-library section was closed because it "could cause trouble", but the potential trouble was never described, so I am now assuming it was because sharing newly released material here could be harmful to the creators. I thought it was because we were at risk of being closed down for copyright reasons.
Can you direct me to the link to the Apollo Sound LP containing the Henryk Debich tracks? I've been looking for it but haven't yet stumbled across it.
-
@swingalong
The non-library section was originally intended for releases by known library musicians on non-library labels — for example, a film soundtrack by Ennio Morricone.
Over time, however, the section started to resemble a colorful dumpster of loosely related material. Gradually, it became a general dumping ground for anything that was not strictly library music.
At that point, the moderators felt it no longer represented the unique purpose of this community, which is to share and discuss library music.
Sharing commercially available music is a different matter. It’s easy to see how doing so can harm publishers and their business, and we aim to respect them and their business.
-
Thank you Fuzi for your explanation.
Perhaps the section could be reopened, but with all submissions held for moderation to ensure nothing is being shared that could cause problems for us?
-
Perhaps the section could be reopened, but with all submissions held for moderation to ensure nothing is being shared that could cause problems for us?
A nice idea but I don't think you've fully thought through the work that might be involved. I think we already put upon our Admin more than we should - especially in light of the recent bout of bickering posts amongst members. Unless, of course, you're putting yourself forward as the moderator Swingalong!
This forum to a large extent is, and should be, self regulating and able to potter along with the minimum of involvement from Admin. In the case of the Non-Library section some members started kicking the backside out of it and pushing the boundaries beyond its original intention. In this instance I think it best to let sleeping dogs lie.